Globally, Conducted Energy Weapons (CEWs), commonly known as tasers, have become recognized as an effective less-lethal force option. As their adoption by police forces worldwide increases, so too does the volume of quality research offering critical evaluations of this technology.

This research trajectory is divided into three distinct phases: Firstly, it undertakes a comprehensive review of existing literature, examining biases, conflicts of interest in CEW studies, and prevalent myths and narratives. This analysis aims to broaden police understanding of the justified use of CEWs, shedding light on the complexities surrounding their deployment.

Secondly, the research assesses the tangible benefits and drawbacks of employing CEWs as a less-lethal option. This includes evaluating field success rates, the impact on marginalized groups such as ethnic minorities, individuals with mental health issues or in crisis, and even children, as well as instances of officer-created jeopardy.

Finally, through the lens of social observation and the examination of strange accounts, this phase aims to highlight the unintended consequences of CEW use. The goal is to advocate for improved training, procedural adjustments, enhanced frontline supervision, and robust accountability mechanisms. Such reforms are essential to recalibrate the expanding justifications for CEW deployment, ensuring their responsible and effective use in law enforcement.